Worldwide Communion of Catholic Apostolic Churches (WCCAC)

 Welcome to the forum of the Worldwide Communion of Catholic Apostolic Churches (WCCAC)
Usergroups Check your PMs Log in
Register

Home | Forum | Arcade

Go Back Post new topic Reply to topic  
Author Message
Administrator
Site Admin


Joined: 02 Sep 2005
Posts: 60

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:53 pm    Post subject: US Supreme Court rejects RICO case against pro-life activist Reply with quote

US Supreme Court rejects RICO case against pro-life activists

Feb. 28 (CWNews.com) - The Supreme Court has ruled that pro-life demonstrations cannot be banned under a federal law intended to fight organized crime.

In a unanimous 8-0 decision announced on February 28, the Supreme Court apparently put an end to a 20-year case, NOW v. Scheidler, in which abortion advocates sought damages against prominent pro-life organizers, claiming that they were engaged in an illegal conspiracy to harm the abortion business.

The abortionists' lawsuit was brought under the federal RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) law. The novel effort to portray pro-lifers as gangsters led to a long series of legal challenges and maneuvers, and the case has come up before the Supreme Court on three separate occasions.

In 2003 the Court ruled that a nationwide injunction against the Pro-Life Action League, granted in 1998, should be voided. But the pro-abortion plaintiffs went back to court yet again, bringing the case before the Supreme Court for the third time.

Justice Stephen Breyer, writing today's unanimous decision for the High Court, observed that pro-life demonstrations could not be seen as "a freestanding violence offense" under the terms of the RICO law. He observed that Congress had made a special effort to address blockades at abortion clinics with the Freedom of Access of Clinic Entances (FACE) law of 1994.

"Naturally I am gratified to be vindicated once again by the United States Supreme Court," said Joe Scheidler, the director of the Pro-Life Action League and defendant in the case. "I am mystified that I had to go to the trouble and expense of appearing before the Supreme Court three times."

Newly appointed Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito did not participate in the decision announced today.

_________________
_______________________________

Forum Administrator
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Forum Index.   Home.
(Page 1 of 1)  
     
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Jump to:  



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Effex-Media Web Resources
phpbb template by zig zag web design
© 2005 Copyright zig zag web design. All rights reserved.



Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free